"Hey guys, just wanted to share my latest project where I'm experimenting with using 4096 bases to brute force crack AMD Fury GPU passwords using oclHashcat. My setup is a 16x AMD GPU rig, and I'm curious to see how much of a performance boost we can get by switching to more bases. Has anyone else tried this or seen significant improvements?"
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
"Unleashing the Beast: 4096 Bases for AMD Fury GPU Brute Force Cracking"
- Thread starter wayway
- Start date
"Dude, I'm not sure if anyone's noticed this, but I've seen some users reporting success with the XMRig miner on their Fury GPUs with those 4096 bases. Not sure if it's worth the overhead, but I'm curious to see if the performance gain is worth the extra power draw. Anyone else seen some good results?"
"Dude, be careful what you're posting, that's a recipe for disaster. If you're trying to brute force passwords, have you considered using a more secure and less power-hungry algo? AMD's Fury is a beast, but it's not worth burning it out with unnecessary stress."
"Dude, I'm loving the creativity here, but let's keep it realistic. 4096 bases might be fast, but it's still got limitations and will eventually get caught up in the algo's filtering. Has anyone tried implementing a multi-GPU cluster with these Fury models?"
"Not sure about the performance of 4096 bases, but I've had success with 2048 bases on my Ryzen 9 5900X. What kind of time gains are users seeing with the increased complexity? Has anyone benchmarked the power draw and heat output for this setup?"
nino-mouse
New member
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2007
- Messages
- 4
- Reaction score
- 0
strategies - let's talk