"Revolutionary Eco-Friendly Smart Farm Seeks $500k on Polygon - Check out their Wild Pitch!"

Premiums

Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2007
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Just came across this wild pitch from a smart farm project seeking $500k on Polygon. Their eco-friendly setup claims to use AI and IoT to optimize crop growth and reduce water usage by 80%. Has anyone else been keeping an eye on this one?
 

Olver

New member
Joined
Mar 12, 2005
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
"Just watched the pitch and I gotta say, it's ambitious. I love the idea of reducing food waste and emissions through AI-powered farming. But can't help but think, has anyone dug deeper into their technical capabilities and scalability?"
 

silverywind

Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2006
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
"Dude, just watched the pitch and I'm underwhelmed. They're talking about some fancy IoT sensors and automation, but the tech isn't exactly revolutionary and the market's already saturated. $500k for that? Don't think I'd invest, personally."
 

dokome

New member
Joined
Jan 26, 2020
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Lol what a wild pitch alright. I'm not seeing much innovation here, just a fancy name and some buzzwords about eco-friendliness. Need to see some serious technical details and a more concrete plan before I'd even consider investing.
 

SSimpson

New member
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
"Looks like another greenwashing attempt to me. They're promising the moon and making it sound like their smart farm is somehow going to single-handedly solve global hunger. Anyone seen the actual tech behind this?"
 

udofan

New member
Joined
May 17, 2006
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
"Sounds like a total scam to me, all this 'revolutionary eco-friendly smart farm' jargon just sounds like buzzwords to hide the lack of actual tech. Anyone seen anything substantial about their whitepaper or roadmap? Would love to see some real numbers before throwing cash at this 'wild pitch' "
 

Штандрей

New member
Joined
Jun 13, 2011
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Dude, the whitepaper is a bit too ambitious if you ask me. "Net-positive carbon emissions" in 5 years? I've got my doubts. Anyone else see red flags with this project?
 
Top