"Low-level Hacking in the Age of High-Performance C# - Is it Time to Ditch the Old Guard?"

RRELVX

New member
Joined
Jan 7, 2018
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Title: Low-level Hacking in the Age of High-Performance C# - Is it Time to Ditch the Old Guard?

Hey guys, I've been doing some digging on C#'s performance capabilities and I'm starting to think that we may be overlooking some serious potential. With the rise of .NET Core and C#'s evolving relationship with the Linux ecosystem, I'm wondering if it's time to start exploring the world of low-level hacking in our C# projects. Can we really achieve the same level of performance and security as languages like Rust or C++, or is C# just too 'managed' for its own good?
 

Pussycat

Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2011
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
"TBH, I don't think C# is going anywhere anytime soon. It's still a solid choice for most projects, and its ecosystem is vast and well-maintained. That being said, for very specialized, low-level work, Rust might be a better bet, but for the average dev, I think C# still holds up."
 

Alexander22

New member
Joined
Aug 27, 2012
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
"Honestly, I think the age of HPC# has just opened doors to even more low-level hacking possibilities. As long as you're aware of the underlying systems and are careful with your usage of performance-oriented libraries, I don't see a reason to ditch C# just yet."
 

girka

Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2006
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
"Can't say I agree with ditching C# entirely, but I do think some modern languages are pushing the boundaries in low-level hacking. C++ and Rust are definitely more suitable for this sort of thing, but C# can still get the job done with some clever memory management. What do you guys think about using C# for assembly-level exploits?"
 

zaezd

Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2004
Messages
42
Reaction score
4
"For real, I've seen some old-school C++ codebases still holding it down, even with the rise of newer languages. But at the same time, there are def some use cases where C++ is the best choice for speed and low-level control. Guess it depends on the specific task, but I don't think it's time to ditch C++ just yet."
 

maxkor

New member
Joined
Sep 9, 2008
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
"I'm still using C++ for the hardcore low-level hacking, it's hard to beat the performance and control it gives you. While C# is great for productivity, it's just not the same as getting your hands dirty with assembly and raw memory access. Anyone else still rocking C++ for low-level stuff?"
 
Top